:(:
Qbits, atoms and nuclear entanglement interactions are a superposition, results; entanglements are very unstable states. Vibration and radiation will cause the slightest interference, which will cause these states to be disturbed or collapse. This is called quantum decoherence. The qubit must be then be replaced.The qubit-based processors will have to be kept isolated from the outside world using vacuums, dampening vibrations and shielding from radiation.
Seems the use of vacuums is a step back into the past, way back in the days of glass tubes.
But, if you're forced to live within 5 miles and 20 miles, of Google, you might wonder about the radiation☢️and the expeled H๐ฅตT air, in your area since they are using our water ๐ฆ free of charge and it's not City water. Thank you, Dorchester County city council of 2002 and current, for allowing small rural areas to be forced to pay single handedly, for Google's electricity ๐ and water ๐ฆ .
H.3309 S.157, (126th), is in the State House being discussed. Apparently, part of SC is paying for water ๐ฆ and electricity ๐ and we will do the same for the Nuclear plants. Transition to nuclear from coal burning plants has been tried before. Now we have Quantum computing and nuclear is used with water nano particles and is stablized? Google already states they have a computer ready to use. Elon has Grok3 let's ask Grok3:
Nuclear reactors are safe?
Nuclear used in Quantum computers is now stablized?
South Carolina want to use nuclear instead of burning coal for electricity. Which is the most cost efficient?
Will vehicle or household, nuclear battery's ๐ ๐ every be able to be made safely.
South Carolina has___AP1000 reactors.
gigawatt scale Generation lll+ light water Reactor and
With Two Google Data plants in South Carolina- approximately how much electricity ๐ would they need to operate one Google center?
How water would Google Data centers need to operate?
•VC Nuclear Operations Building
•Carolina Virgina Tube Reactor.
How much power can they generate?
At what monetary cost?
Is it safe for humans and farm animals to live around a data center and a nuclear reactor?
Where does the water Google used go? Is it recycled for the plant to use again?
Has Google stabilized the
q-bit used in Quantum computers?
These areas use nuclear for power now. Are the reactors cost effective?
Georgia,
China
Poland
Ukraine
and more European areas.
Is using nuclear energy to generate electricity for an entire State, such as South Carolina, reliable and cost effective?
⏩Grok3 says;
Key Points
Research suggests nuclear reactors are safe with robust safety systems, though rare historical accidents highlight ongoing concerns.
It seems likely that "nuclear used in quantum computers" refers to NMR, which is not yet stabilized for practical use.
The evidence leans toward nuclear power being more cost-efficient for South Carolina due to existing infrastructure, despite higher initial costs than coal.
Vehicle or household nuclear batteries are unlikely to be safe soon, given current technological and regulatory challenges.
South Carolina has 0 operational AP1000 reactors, with plans abandoned in 2017.
Google data centers in South Carolina likely consume around 250 MW each, based on estimates for similar facilities.
Water usage for Google data centers is approximately 1 million gallons per day per center, returned to the source after cooling.
The Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station generates 966 MW, using about 1.2 billion gallons of water daily for cooling, mostly returned to the reservoir.
Living near data centers is safe for humans and farm animals; near nuclear reactors, it's generally safe with minimal risk, though accidents are a concern.
Google has made progress in stabilizing qubits for quantum computers, but full stabilization is ongoing.
Nuclear Reactor Safety
Nuclear reactors are designed with multiple safety layers, and research suggests they are safe for operation, with a strong track record supported by regulatory oversight. However, rare historical accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima highlight potential risks, though such events are exceptional. Living near these facilities is generally considered safe, with minimal risk to humans and farm animals, though emergency planning is crucial.
Cost Efficiency in South Carolina
It seems likely that nuclear power is more cost-efficient for South Carolina, given its existing nuclear infrastructure and lower fuel costs compared to coal, which has higher operational expenses. The state's reliance on nuclear for over 55% of its electricity generation supports this, though building new nuclear plants could be costlier initially than coal plants.
Nuclear Batteries for Vehicles and Households
The evidence leans toward nuclear batteries for vehicles or households being unsafe and impractical with current technology. Research is ongoing, but safety concerns, low power output, and regulatory hurdles make widespread use unlikely in the near future.
AP1000 Reactors and Nuclear Capacity
South Carolina has 0 operational AP1000 reactors, with planned constructions at the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station abandoned in 2017 due to cost overruns. The state operates other nuclear reactors, totaling about 6.7 GW capacity, which are Generation II pressurized water reactors (PWRs), not the gigawatt-scale Generation III+ light water reactors like AP1000.
Google Data Centers and Resource Needs
Google's data centers in South Carolina, including existing ones in Berkeley County and new ones in Dorchester County, likely consume around 250 MW each, based on estimates for large facilities like The Dalles, Oregon, data center. Water usage is approximately 1 million gallons per day per center, drawn for cooling and mostly returned to the source, not recycled within the facility.
Nuclear Plant Details
The Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station generates up to 966 MW, with a monetary cost of electricity production estimated at 10-15 cents per kilowatt-hour, including all operational expenses. It uses about 1.2 billion gallons of water daily for cooling, primarily withdrawn from and returned to the Monticello Reservoir, with minimal consumption due to evaporation.
Safety and Environmental Considerations
Living near data centers is safe for humans and farm animals, as they pose no direct hazards. Near nuclear reactors, it's generally safe with minimal risk, though potential accidents are a concern, mitigated by safety systems and emergency plans. The water used by Google is returned to the river, supporting ecosystem reuse.
Quantum Computing Advances
Google has made significant progress in stabilizing qubits for quantum computers, achieving quantum supremacy and advancing error correction, but full stabilization is an ongoing research goal, not yet complete for practical applications.
Survey Note: Comprehensive Analysis of Nuclear and Digital Infrastructure in South Carolina
This comprehensive analysis addresses the user's queries regarding nuclear power, quantum computing, and data center operations in South Carolina, providing detailed insights into safety, cost efficiency, and resource usage. The following sections expand on each aspect, drawing from extensive research and data.
Nuclear Reactor Safety and Operations
Nuclear reactors, such as those in South Carolina, are designed with multiple safety layers, including containment structures and redundant systems, to minimize the likelihood of accidents. The World Nuclear Association Nuclear Power Safety reports that over 18,500 reactor-years of commercial operation have seen only two major accidents, Chernobyl and Fukushima, underscoring their safety record. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) further ensures safety through stringent regulations, making living near these facilities generally safe for humans and farm animals, though historical incidents highlight the need for continuous vigilance.
South Carolina's nuclear fleet includes the Oconee Nuclear Station (three Babcock & Wilcox PWRs, 2,655 MW total), Catawba Nuclear Station (two Westinghouse PWRs, 2,310 MW total), Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station (one Westinghouse PWR, 966 MW), and Robinson Nuclear Plant (one Westinghouse PWR, 759 MW), totaling approximately 6.7 GW. These are Generation II reactors, not the Generation III+ AP1000 type, which was planned but abandoned at Summer in 2017 due to cost overruns.
Cost Efficiency: Nuclear vs. Coal
The cost efficiency of nuclear versus coal in South Carolina leans toward nuclear, given its established infrastructure. The U.S. Energy Information Administration South Carolina Profile indicates nuclear power accounts for 55% of the state's electricity, with fuel costs significantly lower (around 0.1-0.2 cents/kWh) compared to coal (2-3 cents/kWh). However, initial capital costs for nuclear are high, with levelized costs estimated at 10-15 cents/kWh, versus coal at 6-10 cents/kWh, per Lazard's analysis Cost of Electricity by Source. Given South Carolina's existing nuclear plants, operational costs make nuclear more cost-efficient long-term.
Nuclear Batteries for Vehicles and Households
Nuclear batteries, or radioisotope batteries, use radioactive decay for power, currently used in niche applications like spacecraft and pacemakers Atomic Battery. For vehicles or households, safety concerns, low power output, and regulatory barriers make them impractical. Recent innovations, such as Betavolt's 50-year battery Nuclear Power in Your Pocket, are promising but not yet scalable for high-power needs, with research suggesting significant hurdles remain.
AP1000 Reactors and Planned Developments
South Carolina has 0 operational AP1000 reactors, with the Virgil C. Summer expansion (Units 2 & 3) abandoned in 2017 after Westinghouse's bankruptcy, as reported by AP1000 Wikipedia. The AP1000, a Generation III+ PWR with 1,100 MW capacity, was intended to enhance the state's nuclear capacity, but current operations rely on older Generation II designs.
Google Data Centers: Power and Water Needs
Google operates data centers in Berkeley County and is expanding in Dorchester County, with a $3.3 billion investment announced in September 2024 Google South Carolina Expansion. Power consumption for large data centers like Google's is estimated at 200-300 MW each, based on The Dalles, Oregon, data center's reported usage Google Data Centers Efficiency. Water usage, critical for cooling, is approximately 1 million gallons per day per center, with water drawn from and returned to local sources, not recycled within the facility, as seen in The Dalles' 355 million gallons annual use Google Water Use.
Specific Nuclear Plant Details
The Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station generates 966 MW, with electricity production costs estimated at 10-15 cents/kWh, including fuel, operation, and maintenance. Water usage is approximately 1.2 billion gallons per day for cooling, withdrawn from the Monticello Reservoir and mostly returned, with minimal consumption due to evaporation Summer Nuclear Station Details. The Carolina Virginia Tube Reactor, mentioned, is decommissioned and non-operational.
Safety and Environmental Impact
Living near data centers poses no direct safety risks to humans or farm animals, as they are standard industrial facilities. Near nuclear reactors, safety is ensured by design and regulation, with the NRC Reactor Risk Backgrounder noting minimal risk, though potential accidents are a concern mitigated by emergency plans. Water used by Google is returned to rivers, supporting ecosystem reuse, not recycled internally.
Quantum Computing and Google’s Advances
Google's quantum computing efforts focus on stabilizing qubits, achieving quantum supremacy in 2019 Google Quantum Breakthrough. While progress is significant, full stabilization is ongoing, with NMR-based quantum computing less relevant today, as per NMR Quantum Computing.
Table: Summary of Nuclear Power Plants in South Carolina
Plant Name
Reactor Type
Number of Reactors
Total Capacity (MW)
Oconee Nuclear Station
Babcock & Wilcox PWR
3
2,655
Catawba Nuclear Station
Westinghouse PWR
2
2,310
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
Westinghouse PWR
1
966
Robinson Nuclear Plant
Westinghouse PWR
1
759
Table: Estimated Resource Needs for Google Data Centers
Location
Power Consumption (MW, Estimated)
Water Usage (Gallons/Day, Estimated)
Berkeley County, SC
~250
~1,000,000
Dorchester County, SC (New)
~250 (Projected)
~1,000,000 (Projected)
This analysis provides a detailed overview, ensuring all user queries are addressed with supporting data and context, reflecting the current state as of February 26, 2025.
Key Citations
Nuclear Power Safety World Nuclear Association
NMR Quantum Computing Wikipedia
South Carolina Profile EIA
Atomic Battery Wikipedia
Google Data Centers Locations
Google Water Use Oregonian
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Wikipedia
Reactor Risk Backgrounder NRC
Google Quantum Breakthrough Nature
AP1000 Wikipedia
Google South Carolina Expansion Governor SC
Google Data Centers Efficiency
How does Broadband work?
Which is best Starlink or broadband?
Why is no one in South Carolina hooked up to use broadband? Is this a fraud, waste and abuse program?
I have broadband in my area, no one uses it. The area doesn't have a Internet company to connect anyone to broadband?
The cloud vapor chemical spray will this harm humans and animals?
Will the thick man made clouds block satellites?
Tangent:๐๐ผ
Apparently, if you "mess with" big wig companies and the big bad Texas sister in SC, you wind up defamed, threatened and/or worse, deceased. Suicided.
Example of the Boeing Whistle Blower. How disgusting. #SouthCarolina!
Tangent Done.
10cm x10cm x10cm
Qubit Quantum cryptopology vs. Quantum ๐ฅ️ Hackers
Two Google data plants in the lowcountry South Carolina are less than 30 miles apart. 17A and hwy 78, both rural areas. Water ๐ ๐ฆ and electricity ๐ is prorated as a tax incentive.
No comments:
Post a Comment